Can Fin Homes Ltd – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	Can Fin Homes Ltd has established a basic advocacy governance framework through its “Policy on Responsible Advocacy”, which defines advocacy as “activities performed while interfacing with a wide range of stakeholders … with the objective of influencing policy, regulations and other decision making endeavours” and mandates that employees “achieve total compliance with all applicable regulations”, “focus on transparency, accountability, strong corporate governance standards and ethical guiding principles” and implement “record management tools” alongside “grievance redressal mechanisms” and disciplinary measures. The policy also provides that “The policy shall be reviewed periodically for its appropriateness and updated as and when, necessary,” indicating a regular review mechanism. However, the company does not disclose any governance processes for aligning its direct or indirect advocacy with climate-related goals, nor does it name a specific individual or formal body responsible for overseeing its lobbying activities. We found no evidence of procedures for monitoring or managing engagement with trade associations or policymakers in relation to climate policy, which limits transparency around how advocacy efforts support the company’s environmental objectives. View Sources	D

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

Limited

Can Fin Homes Ltd has established a basic advocacy governance framework through its “Policy on Responsible Advocacy”, which defines advocacy as “activities performed while interfacing with a wide range of stakeholders … with the objective of influencing policy, regulations and other decision making endeavours” and mandates that employees “achieve total compliance with all applicable regulations”, “focus on transparency, accountability, strong corporate governance standards and ethical guiding principles” and implement “record management tools” alongside “grievance redressal mechanisms” and disciplinary measures. The policy also provides that “The policy shall be reviewed periodically for its appropriateness and updated as and when, necessary,” indicating a regular review mechanism. However, the company does not disclose any governance processes for aligning its direct or indirect advocacy with climate-related goals, nor does it name a specific individual or formal body responsible for overseeing its lobbying activities. We found no evidence of procedures for monitoring or managing engagement with trade associations or policymakers in relation to climate policy, which limits transparency around how advocacy efforts support the company’s environmental objectives.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
None	No evidence found	E