Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
Cheng Shin Rubber Industry Co Ltd does not disclose any governance process for lobbying activities, climate or otherwise. The evidence describes a “Sustainable Development Steering Group” responsible for “planning and implementing the sustainable development strategy” and submitting “a sustainability report to the Board of Directors,” and notes that the “Board of Directors supervises and implements the three 100% corporate cultures to practice the ESG spirit,” but there is no mention of lobbying oversight, monitoring of direct or indirect lobbying, trade association engagement, or a policy to align lobbying with its climate or sustainability goals. We found no evidence of a specific individual or formal body that oversees or reviews lobbying alignment, nor any process to manage or audit lobbying activities, direct or indirect, within the company’s disclosures.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Cheng Shin Rubber Industry Co. Ltd offers only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The company indicates that it has engaged on broad policy themes such as carbon pricing, carbon taxes, and subsidies, but it does not identify any concrete pieces of legislation, regulations, or jurisdictions involved, leaving readers unable to determine the specific policy arenas in which it is active. It also fails to explain how it conducts this engagement: no letters, meetings, trade-association work, or other channels are described, nor are any governmental bodies or individual policymakers named. Finally, while the disclosure notes that the company offers "support with major exceptions" for carbon taxes and mentions a "proposed alternative policy," it stops short of specifying the amendments or outcomes it seeks. Because the company discloses only general policy categories and a vague statement of support, with no detail on mechanisms or desired policy changes, the overall transparency of its climate lobbying is limited.
|
D
|