AECOM

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited AECOM offers only limited insight into its climate-policy advocacy. The sole concrete example is CEO Troy Rudd’s appearance before the U.S. Congress on 17 March 2021, where he stated that he “testified in front of Congress to advocate for transportation systems that will better serve communities and reduce impacts on the environment.” This identifies one direct mechanism—oral testimony—and a clear target—the U.S. Congress. Beyond this instance, the company does not describe any additional letters, meetings, trade-association activity, or other channels it uses to influence public policy. Likewise, it names no specific bills or regulations; instead it refers only generally to the transportation infrastructure policy area, leaving the actual legislation that it sought to shape unidentified. The outcomes it says it supports—lower greenhouse-gas emissions, more resilient transport networks, economic growth, and greater equity—remain broad aspirations rather than defined legislative or regulatory changes. Because the disclosure stops short of detailing multiple policies, mechanisms, or precise goals, the overall transparency of AECOM’s climate-lobbying activities remains limited. 1
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited AECOM appears to have limited governance processes specific to climate-related lobbying. "AECOM’s Board, including through its Nominating and Governance Committee, has oversight of our company’s general policy relating to the support of trade associations, political organizations, and lobbying activities," and the Safety, Risk, and Sustainability Committee “has direct oversight of our company’s ESG policies and programs, including reviewing and evaluating ESG plans and practices.” The company also discloses that “AECOM conducts several forms of training relating to lobbying, including annual training and certification regarding our company’s Code of Conduct, and specialized training for company employees involved in the engagement of lobbyists and other advocates.” These disclosures demonstrate board-level oversight and regular staff training, but we found no evidence of any formal process to review, manage or align either its direct lobbying efforts or the positions of its trade and industry associations with its climate or ESG objectives. 1