Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Wizz Air discloses a highly detailed picture of its climate-policy lobbying. It names a wide range of specific measures it has engaged on, including the EU Emissions Trading System Aviation file, the European Commission’s ReFuelEU Aviation proposal, the Energy Taxation Directive, the Single European Sky 2+ reform, and national Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) strategies in Austria and Hungary, as well as its broader involvement with the EU Fit for 55 package. The company also explains how it tries to influence those files: a dedicated EU Affairs Manager conducts “regular engagement with policy makers in the EU”, the airline is listed in the EU Transparency Register and works through public-affairs consultancies such as Hume-Brophy and Penta, it takes part in formal consultations, sits on the UK government’s JetZero Council (“The Company is a member of the two delivery groups of the UK government’s main advisory body on sustainable aviation, the JetZero Council”), and participates in the UAE Aviation Environment Working Group, together demonstrating both direct and indirect lobbying routes and clearly identified targets. Finally, Wizz Air is explicit about the outcomes it seeks, backing the extension of ETS coverage to all EEA departures, the early phase-out of free allowances, and the creation of SAF allowances (“We agree with the introduction of the SAF allowances into ETS, to incentivise SAF uptake across Europe”); advocating for a book-and-claim system in ReFuelEU and “significant investment support”; supporting SES2+ to cut emissions (“We could further reduce our emissions if the SES2 is effectively carried out”); while opposing aspects of the Energy Taxation Directive on the grounds that “double taxation needs to be avoided” and “Wizz Air cannot support an additional financial burden to be introduced for airlines”. This level of specificity across the policies addressed, the mechanisms used, and the concrete policy changes sought demonstrates comprehensive transparency in the company’s climate-related lobbying disclosures. | 4 |