Ingenia Communities Group

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Moderate Ingenia Communities names two specific legislative areas—reforms to land lease legislation in Queensland and proposed changes to built form and certification requirements for land lease homes in New South Wales—demonstrating transparency around the policies it engages on. The company describes its lobbying approach via direct engagement with federal, state, and local governments and collaboration with industry groups such as the Property Council of Australia and the Green Building Council of Australia. While these disclosures outline its structured mechanisms and targets, Ingenia does not identify individual policymakers or jurisdictions beyond these groups, nor does it set out measurable policy outcomes or the precise amendments it seeks, instead articulating general aspirations to advance its climate strategy and sustainability goals. 2
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
None Ingenia Communities Group provides detailed disclosures on its climate and sustainability oversight—highlighting that “The Ingenia Board retains direct responsibility for matters relating to broad business impacts, including corporate strategy, financial management and compliance, and risk management” and that its “Audit, Risk and Sustainability Committee . . . meets at least quarterly” to consider “climate-related risks,” including policy and physical risks and to review “decarbonisation strategies, energy strategies and climate adaptation and resilience.” However, we found no evidence of any governance process relating to the oversight, monitoring or alignment of its lobbying activities—whether direct or via trade associations—and the company does not disclose any individual, committee or review mechanism charged with ensuring that its lobbying aligns with its climate or broader policy objectives. 0