Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate | Avery Dennison provides a moderate level of transparency on its climate-policy lobbying. It names two identifiable EU regulations it is actively supporting—the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation—stating, for example, a wish to “Prioritize the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) implementation… by 2030” and to “Implement the … Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) with no delays.” The company also sets out concrete results it wants from these files, including “Prioritize the roll-out of the DPP for first product groups by the end of 2026,” “Develop a DPP standard that applies to all digital labels mandated by EU legislation,” and “Introduce policy measures that incentivize circular transformation investments,” demonstrating clarity on its desired policy outcomes. By contrast, its description of how it seeks to influence policy is less detailed: it acknowledges involvement through trade associations and public-affairs agencies and notes that “We do not spend money on lobbying or political contributions,” and that it works with “a Belgium-based and a Washington D.C.-based public affairs agency to provide monitoring and policy analysis,” but it rarely identifies the particular government bodies or officials it contacts. As a result, while the objectives and policy focus are clearly articulated, the specific mechanisms and targets of its lobbying remain only partly disclosed. | 2 |