Kuraray Co Ltd

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Kuraray provides a basic, but still limited, window into its climate-policy lobbying. It identifies one specific policy area—“炭素税” (carbon tax)—and situates this within Japan’s national context and its participation in the government-backed “GXリーグ,” showing that the company is engaging with a concrete piece of climate legislation rather than speaking only in generalities. The company also describes the mechanism and target of that engagement, noting that it lobbies through participation in the “GXリーグ,” which is coordinated by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, thereby clarifying both how and with whom it interacts. However, it does not mention any additional lobbying channels, such as direct meetings, submissions, or trade-association work, nor does it name any other policymaking bodies. Finally, while the disclosure states an intention to “促進していく” (promote) collaborative efforts to cut greenhouse-gas emissions, it stops short of outlining the concrete policy changes or quantitative outcomes it seeks from the carbon-tax debate. Overall, the company demonstrates some transparency but leaves significant gaps about the breadth of its policy focus, the full range of lobbying approaches, and the specific legislative results it is pursuing. 1
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Moderate Kuraray outlines a defined, albeit relatively high-level, process for governing its climate-related policy engagement, stating that "クラレグループの気候変動戦略はサステナビリティ委員会およびリスク・コンプライアンス委員会の両委員会を軸にグループ全体の施策を進めている" and that, for external engagement, reports are submitted to the "サステナビリティ委員会" which is "社長を委員長" so that the committee "グループ全体の気候変動戦略との適合を監督し、指示を反映している." This indicates a formal mechanism—regular reporting to a President-chaired Sustainability Committee—to oversee whether lobbying or other engagement aligns with the company’s climate strategy, and clearly identifies who holds oversight responsibility, signalling moderate governance. However, the disclosure does not describe how alignment is evaluated in practice, whether indirect lobbying through trade associations is reviewed, or any escalation or corrective measures where misalignment is found, so the transparency and breadth of the governance framework remain limited. 2