Steel Dynamics Inc

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Comprehensive Steel Dynamics Inc. provides extensive and specific information about its climate-policy lobbying. It names multiple concrete initiatives it seeks to influence, including Federal Buy Clean provisions under the Inflation Reduction Act, the Global Arrangement on Sustainable Steel and Aluminum, guidance being developed by the SBTi Steel Expert Advisory Group, and the Global Steel Climate Council’s proposed measurement standard, clearly demonstrating the breadth of its policy engagement. The company is equally clear on how and where it lobbies: it outlines “meetings, presentations at conferences/seminars, information sharing through press releases and our website,” notes that it “participated in GSA Industry Discussions in 2022 related to developing Federal Buy Clean policies through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA),” joined the “SBTi’s Steel Expert Advisory Group (EAG),” and held “bi-monthly meetings to provide guidance on the U.S. position” with trade negotiators at the U.S. Trade Representative’s office—each example pairing a specific mechanism with an identified government or standard-setting target. The company also spells out the concrete outcomes it is pursuing: it opposes “higher limits based upon the steelmaking method” in the interim IRA Low-Embodied-Carbon rules because such limits “disincentivize and delay decarbonization,” advocates adoption of “a single standard, as proposed in the GSCC Steel Climate Standard,” and supports provisions in the U.S.–EU Global Arrangement that would tackle non-market excess capacity and lower carbon intensity. This level of detail across policies, mechanisms, and desired outcomes reflects a comprehensive degree of transparency around its climate-related lobbying activities. 4
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Steel Dynamics states a “public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement” and indicates it is “active in our trade groups and also have direct representation in Washington DC” to influence policy; however, the company does not disclose any mechanisms for how these lobbying activities are monitored or managed, nor identify a specific individual or formal body responsible for oversight. We found no evidence of defined review procedures, sign‐off requirements, or criteria for aligning its direct or indirect lobbying with its climate objectives, indicating limited governance around its climate lobbying efforts. 1