Energisa S/A

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Sign Up

Direct Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Comprehensive	Energisa provides an exceptionally detailed picture of its climate-related public-policy engagement. It names several specific measures it has worked on, including the fourth electricity-distribution regulatory period for 2021-2025, proposed amendments to Law 5346 on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources for Electricity Generation to encourage national energy-storage technologies, revisions to limits and quotas for non-solar and non-wind renewable investments, sustainability disclosure rules in financial filings, and new legislation to advance smart-grid deployment. The company also explains how it lobbies: it participates in formal regulatory consultations, serves on the TEHAD charging-station committee, attends multi-stakeholder meetings on electric-vehicle charging infrastructure, contributes to Turkey’s Climate Council, and holds direct discussions with named bodies such as ETKB, EPDK, the Ministry of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change, ELDER, EPİAŞ and TEDAŞ. Finally, it is explicit about what it wants to achieve—stronger support for energy-storage technologies, expanded renewable-capacity quotas, regulations that accelerate smart-grid integration, and feasibility work on innovations like floating solar and offshore wind—clearly linking each engagement to an intended policy outcome. Together, these disclosures demonstrate a comprehensive level of transparency around the company’s climate-policy lobbying.	4

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
None	Enerjisa S/A does not disclose any governance mechanisms to ensure its policy engagement activities align with its climate change strategy. Although the company explains that it “actively engages with policy makers, trade associations and other organizations” and “participate[s] in meetings and conferences organized by the ministry and other major institutions such as EPDK, EPİAŞ and TUSIAD to share our expertise, assess the market and monitor and guide regulatory developments,” it does not describe any internal policy, review processes or oversight bodies to manage or sign off on lobbying alignment. We found no evidence of a named individual or formal committee responsible for reviewing or approving its lobbying positions, and no indication of a dedicated monitoring procedure or audit of climate-related advocacy. While Enerjisa notes that it is “currently working on its Net-Zero Project which includes setting emission reduction goals in line with the latest climate science and Paris Agreement goals” and plans to make a public commitment to the Paris Agreement after finalizing that project, it does not disclose how its engagement with policy makers and trade associations will be governed to reflect these targets.	0