SK IE Technology Co Ltd

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Sign Up

Direct Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Comprehensive	SK IE Technology provides a highly detailed picture of its climate-policy lobbying. It identifies the exact policy instruments it engages on, including the RE100 global initiative, the Korean K-RE100 scheme run by the Korea Energy Agency, the electricity “green premium” purchasing programme administered by KEPCO, and the Amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the Electric Utility Act that enables corporate power-purchase agreements. The company also explains the channels it uses and the decision-makers it addresses: it takes part in government-hosted RE100 meetings and conferences, attends round-table discussions chaired by the Vice-Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy, bids in the Green Premium auctions, and works directly with both the Korea Energy Agency and KEPCO. Finally, it is explicit about the outcomes it is pursuing, such as early achievement of 60 % renewable electricity by 2025 and 100 % by 2030, greater payment flexibility under PPAs, reduced extra charges for renewable purchases, and additional incentives for RE100 participation, as well as broader “system improvements” to embed these changes in regulation. This combination of clearly named policies, well-defined mechanisms and targets, and concrete policy goals demonstrates a comprehensive level of transparency in the company’s climate-related lobbying disclosures.	4

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
None	SK IE Technology provides detailed disclosures on its broader climate change strategy, noting that “SK ie Technology has established a roadmap to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in stages by 2035” and that “the organization's climate change strategy is managed in a consistent manner throughout the company through company-wide materiality assessment and discussions with management including the CEO.” However, we found no evidence of any processes, oversight structures, or accountability measures specifically governing direct or indirect lobbying activities or aligning such lobbying with its climate commitments, and the company does not disclose any individual or committee responsible for lobbying governance.	0