Eurazeo SE

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Sign Up

Direct Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Strong	Eurazeo provides a detailed account of its climate-policy lobbying, naming both the methods it uses and the entities it engages. The company discloses that it met directly with policymakers, signed onto advocacy letters, responded to official consultations, and offered technical input via government-backed working groups. It identifies the specific targets of these efforts—EFRAG, AFEP, Medef, and the French Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté Industrielle et Numérique—demonstrating a high level of clarity about its lobbying mechanisms. On policy substance, Eurazeo has publicly participated in EFRAG’s working group on non-financial reporting standards, engaged with the French Ministry to strengthen sustainability management, and worked with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers to advance sustainability issues, outlining each engagement clearly. Finally, the company articulates the outcomes it seeks: it aims to bolster corporate sustainability management, align its targets with the Paris Agreement, define robust decarbonization objectives, and advocate for adoption of frameworks such as the Science-Based Targets Initiative and the European Taxonomy to drive climate action and sustainability improvements.	3

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
None	Eurazeo SE does not disclose a governance process specifically for lobbying activities, including climate-related lobbying. While the company highlights its ESG governance structure, such as the ESG Committee within the Conseil de Surveillance and the ESG team led by Sophie Flak, these disclosures focus on general ESG oversight and do not explicitly address lobbying governance. The evidence mentions public commitments to initiatives like the UN Principles for Responsible Investment and the Business Climate Pledge, but these are policy commitments rather than mechanisms for governing lobbying activities. Additionally, there is no mention of processes for monitoring or aligning lobbying activities, nor is there evidence of oversight specific to lobbying alignment with climate goals. The company does not disclose any specific individual or committee responsible for reviewing or managing lobbying activities, whether direct or indirect. Therefore, no evidence of a lobbying governance framework is found in the provided disclosures.	0