Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Restaurant Brands International provides a “public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement” and emphasizes “ongoing stakeholder engagement” as a “continuous process” to “identify and understand issues, risks and opportunities,” including through “direct engagement or industry associations” to “understand priorities and demonstrate regulation compliance” and to “inform legislative and government officials of our commitment, and advocate in the best interest of our brands.” However, the company does not disclose any formal policy or procedure for monitoring or reviewing how its lobbying activities align with its climate strategy, nor does it specify any individual or committee responsible for overseeing its policy engagement or detail how it manages its direct or indirect lobbying channels.
View Sources
|
D
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Restaurant Brands International provides only very limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It notes that it engages "through direct engagement or industry associations" with "policymakers" to understand priorities and demonstrate compliance, but it does not identify which government bodies, officials, or jurisdictions it contacts, nor does it describe the concrete channels it uses beyond this generic reference. No specific climate policy, law or regulation is named, and the disclosure gives no indication of whether the company focuses on issues such as carbon pricing, renewable energy standards or other climate measures. Similarly, while the company says it "advocate[s] in the best interest of our brands," it offers no detail on the legislative or regulatory outcomes it is promoting or opposing. As a result, the disclosure offers only a minimal acknowledgement that some engagement occurs, without meaningful transparency on the policies addressed, the methods employed, or the results sought.
|
D
|