Ecopro Co Ltd

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Ecopro Co. Ltd. shows only limited transparency on its climate-related lobbying. It does name two identifiable policy areas it engages with, citing work on “Emissions trading schemes” and preparation for the “EU Battery Passport,” and it categorises these under climate-change mitigation and reporting, which allows readers to understand the focus of its advocacy. However, it gives virtually no insight into how it tries to influence these measures: apart from noting that “EcoproBM, a member of the Ecopro Group, was selected as a subject of the emissions trading system and was given a target for 2023 usage performance,” the disclosure does not describe meetings, letters, submissions, association activity, or the government bodies approached. The company’s policy stance is expressed only in broad terms, stating “Support with no exceptions” and confirming the policies are “aligned” with the Paris Agreement, without detailing any specific amendments or regulatory outcomes it seeks. Because the mechanisms of influence and the concrete objectives of its lobbying are not explained, the overall visibility into the company’s climate-policy advocacy remains narrow. 1
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Ecopro Co Ltd has demonstrated a public pledge to align its policy engagement with climate objectives, answering "Yes" to whether it has "a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement." However, the company does not disclose how these engagement activities are monitored or managed, names no individual or committee responsible for oversight of its lobbying, and offers no description of processes to align either its direct advocacy or its participation in trade associations with its climate policy. We found no evidence of a formal review mechanism, oversight structure, or assessment criteria for its climate-related advocacy beyond this commitment. 1