Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate |
McDonald’s provides some insight into how it governs the alignment between its climate strategy and its external policy engagement, indicating a developing but not yet comprehensive process. The company explains that “the Global Impact department provides corporate staff leadership, coordination, and support for our global social and environmental impact policies… This group includes Global Communications, Public Policy & Government Relations… [who] help manage overall climate change strategy integration and consistency for external engagement practices, such as with NGOs or policymakers,” showing that a defined mechanism exists for checking that direct advocacy is consistent with climate goals. Oversight responsibility is attributed to named senior executives: “the Chief Global Impact Officer and Chief Sustainability & Social Impact Officer… are jointly responsible for overseeing performance, actions and goals relating to climate… and report on climate-related issues to the Board twice per year,” which indicates a clear chain of accountability for climate-related engagement activities. In addition, the Board has established a body that touches on political activity, stating that “the McDonald’s Corporation Board of Directors created the Public Policy & Strategy Committee to evaluate potential contributions in a manner consistent with the Company’s core values,” suggesting at least one formal committee reviews elements of external policy influence. However, the disclosures stop short of describing a systematic procedure for assessing or correcting misalignment in indirect lobbying; there is no public reference to reviewing trade-association positions, publishing a lobbying alignment report, or withdrawing from associations that conflict with the company’s climate strategy. Likewise, while governance of political contributions is noted, we found no evidence of a documented, recurring audit covering the full scope of climate lobbying activities. Consequently, the company shows a moderate level of lobbying-governance transparency—clear roles and a stated integration process exist, but detailed monitoring, indirect-lobbying alignment measures, and public reporting remain undisclosed.
View Sources
|
C |