Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Limited |
CTCI Corp discloses that a “group-level ESG & Net Zero office and [a] dedicated CSO” are “responsible for… the control and accountability of five major fields: policy, system, engagement, disclosure, and progress” and that progress is “report[ed] to the monthly group ESG & Net Zero meeting under the supervision of the President… and… to the Group Chairman.” The company also states it has a “public commitment… to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement” and claims that the Sustainability and Net Zero Emissions Committee under the Board “keeps track of the progress and effectiveness through Group meetings, and reports them annually to the Board of Directors.” These statements indicate some oversight of climate-related engagement and a declared intention to align such engagement with Paris goals, suggesting limited governance of lobbying alignment. However, the evidence does not describe any specific procedures for reviewing or approving direct lobbying positions, assessing the climate positions of trade associations, or producing a lobbying-alignment report, and no individual or committee is explicitly tasked with monitoring lobbying activities themselves; therefore, disclosures point to only a basic, high-level framework rather than a detailed lobbying governance process.
View Sources
|
D |