Link REIT – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
None	Link REIT does not disclose any governance process for lobbying or climate-related lobbying activities. The evidence provided focuses on sustainability policy oversight, stating for example that “Climate-related risks and opportunities are identified and monitored by our Director of S&RG and reported to the Board on a regular basis,” and that “This Policy will be regularly reviewed considering legislative and organisational changes,” but there is no reference to monitoring, review, or alignment of lobbying efforts, no mention of oversight bodies or individuals responsible for lobbying, nor any procedures for managing direct or indirect lobbying. We found no evidence of any lobbying governance framework. View Sources	E

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

None

Link REIT does not disclose any governance process for lobbying or climate-related lobbying activities. The evidence provided focuses on sustainability policy oversight, stating for example that “Climate-related risks and opportunities are identified and monitored by our Director of S&RG and reported to the Board on a regular basis,” and that “This Policy will be regularly reviewed considering legislative and organisational changes,” but there is no reference to monitoring, review, or alignment of lobbying efforts, no mention of oversight bodies or individuals responsible for lobbying, nor any procedures for managing direct or indirect lobbying. We found no evidence of any lobbying governance framework.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	Link REIT offers only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The disclosure notes that the company “establishes partnerships with policymakers and industry leaders to develop policies and innovations related to energy efficiency and climate resilience,” showing that it engages in climate policy discussions, but it does not name any specific laws, regulations or legislative proposals it has tried to influence. The only mechanism described is these broad partnerships; no concrete tactics such as written submissions, direct meetings, or consultation responses, and no specific governmental bodies or legislators, are identified. Likewise, while the company sets ambitious internal targets—such as achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2035—it does not indicate any external policy changes it seeks from government or explain the positions it advocates. This leaves readers with a general sense that some engagement occurs, but without detail on the policies addressed, how the engagement is conducted, or the outcomes the company hopes to achieve.	D