Blue Star Ltd

Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
None Blue Star Ltd frames its policy engagement under “Principle 7: Businesses, when engaged in influencing public and regulatory policy, should do so in a responsible manner,” and states that it is “very active on the industry front” by collaborating with “industrial institutions and professional bodies” such as CII, FICCI, RAMA, and TERI to “provide advocacy in matters pertaining to advancement of the industry and public good.” However, the company does not disclose any internal governance structures, oversight mechanisms, or accountability measures for its lobbying: we found no evidence of a policy or process for “monitoring or managing lobbying activities,” no identified individual or committee overseeing its engagements, and no description of how its advocacy is aligned with its climate or sustainability objectives.

View Sources

E
Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited Blue Star Ltd provides only limited insight into its climate-policy lobbying. It refers to working on broad initiatives such as the India Cooling Action Plan, Energy Labelling, E-waste, Circular Economy, Green Buildings, Decarbonisation and LiFE, which signals some engagement with climate policy areas, but it does not spell out the specific bills, regulations or rulemakings it has tried to influence or give enough detail to uniquely identify them. The company simply notes its “participation in industry programs and initiatives” without describing how it engages—no letters, meetings, consultation submissions or use of trade associations are disclosed, and no policymaking targets are named. Likewise, while the company links these activities to a general ambition of “preparing for its Net Zero Mission” and supporting broader decarbonisation goals, it does not articulate the concrete legislative or regulatory changes it is advocating for. Because the disclosures lack detail on the mechanisms of influence and on the precise outcomes sought, transparency around its climate lobbying remains minimal.

D