Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate |
NN Group discloses a basic governance structure that connects its climate-related strategy with its policy-engagement activities but provides limited detail on how lobbying alignment is actively monitored. The company states that “The Corporate Citizenship team of NN Group, under the responsibility of Management Board's Chief Organization & Corporate Relation, is responsible for the consistency of the overall sustainability strategy including climate change” and that these senior representatives sit on internal bodies such as “the NN ESG Policy Committee” to ensure a “consistent approach” across engagement activities, which indicates the existence of an internal process meant to align external advocacy with climate objectives. Oversight is further clarified by the disclosure that “NN Group has a dedicated Public and Government Affairs (PGA) team. The PGA team reports to Director Corporate Relations and to the responsible Member of the Management Board NN Group (Chief People, Communications, and Sustainability Officer),” demonstrating that a named management-board member receives regular reporting on lobbying matters. The Annual General Meeting minutes add that the company lobbies “through associations like the Verbond van Verzekeraars … and other European groups like Insurance Europe” and that “there is always alignment and involvement on the important topics” with a commitment that “NN will continue to report on this,” suggesting some attention to indirect lobbying alignment, although no criteria or formal review mechanism is described. We found no evidence of a publicly available lobbying-alignment audit, no explicit procedure for assessing trade-association positions, and no description of corrective actions (such as escalation or withdrawal) when misalignments occur. Therefore, while NN Group identifies responsible teams and a high-level process linking climate strategy to engagement, the disclosure lacks granular monitoring methods, board-approved review cycles, or detailed outcomes, indicating only moderate transparency and control over climate-related lobbying activities.
View Sources
|
C |