Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Comprehensive |
CGI Inc. is highly transparent about its climate-policy lobbying posture because it expressly states that it undertakes no such activity and explains why. The company declares, “No, we have assessed our activities, and none could directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the environment,” and adds that “The engagement in policy-related activities is not our strategic priority.” By affirming that it does not lobby on any climate policy, naming no mechanisms or targets, and providing a clear rationale for this stance, CGI fully discloses its position across all three dimensions—policies, mechanisms and desired outcomes—even though those dimensions are effectively null. This explicit, reasoned non-engagement demonstrates a comprehensive level of transparency about the company’s lack of climate-related lobbying.
|
4
|
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| None |
CGI Inc. outlines extensive climate governance through structures such as “a two-tier structure consisting of our Sustainability Executive Steering Committee chaired by the UK and Australia President, and our UK and Australia Sustainability Committee and working groups which are overseen by the UK and Australia Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO),” and describes actions like defining “a climate roadmap with measurable short- and medium-term targets” and assembling “an internal climate working group to support and drive a range of domestic actions,” but we found no evidence of any governance processes specific to lobbying or policy engagement—no oversight of direct or indirect lobbying, no mention of responsible individuals for political advocacy alignment, nor any monitoring or management procedures to ensure lobbying aligns with its climate strategy.
|
0
|