Systemair AB

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Sign Up

Direct Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Limited	Systemair provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying activity. The company notes that it is "actively participating in international trade associations such as AMCA International and Eurovent" and that these bodies "pursue issues at the political level," indicating some indirect engagement, but it does not identify which policymakers or jurisdictions are contacted or describe any concrete channels such as meetings, submissions, or letters. Its references to the "EU Green Deal" and to North American investment programmes as drivers for ventilation markets show awareness of climate policy, yet the company does not name any specific bills, regulations, or rulemakings it has tried to influence. Likewise, while it voices general support for regulatory requirements that promote energy efficiency and innovation, it does not articulate the particular policy changes it seeks. As a result, the disclosures reveal only that Systemair engages broadly through trade associations and supports stronger energy-efficiency standards, without detailing the policies, mechanisms, or concrete outcomes involved.	1

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
None	Systemair does not disclose any governance process for its direct or indirect lobbying activities, including climate-related policy engagement. While the company emphasizes “Greater engagement in industry ­associations” and states that “we actively pursue issues, both at political level and among the general public,” it does not describe any internal mechanisms for overseeing, reviewing or aligning these activities with its strategic or climate objectives. The company’s environmental governance is clearly managed—“Group Management owns Systemair’s sustainability strategy” with “All core issues have an owner in Group Management,” and the “Code of Conduct … is reviewed once a year and … subject to approval by the Company’s Board of Directors”—but we found no evidence that these structures govern political advocacy or trade-association positions. No individual or formal body is identified as overseeing lobbying alignment, and the company does not disclose any policy, audit or monitoring process for its lobbying or its associations’ advocacy.	0