Nabtesco Corp

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Nabtesco provides only limited insight into its climate-policy lobbying. It references working on “Emissions – CO2” through an environmental conservation agreement with the municipality of Tarui in Gifu Prefecture and states broad support for renewable-energy generation in Japan, but it does not name any specific statutes, regulations or bill numbers, nor does it confirm that these are the only policies with which it engages. The company describes the way it engages as “緊密な連携” (close collaboration) with Tarui town and notes participation in the Japan Climate Initiative, but it gives no further detail about the concrete tools used (such as formal meetings, written submissions, or consultations) or the government bodies reached through the coalition. The objectives it discloses are likewise general—such as “温室効果ガスの排出の抑制” (reducing greenhouse-gas emissions), “グリーン購入及びグリーン調達” (green purchasing and procurement), and encouraging Japan to play a larger global role on climate change—without specifying measurable targets or legislative changes it seeks. As a result, the company’s disclosure reveals that some lobbying takes place but leaves most of the policy names, methods of influence, and concrete outcomes unarticulated. 1
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Strong Nabtesco Corp reports a structured governance framework for its climate-related engagement activities, highlighting that it has “グループESH委員会を設置している” as a CEO-direct oversight body and that the committee “年1回以上開催されるものとし、事務局は環境安全部門で担当する”, demonstrating a formal and recurring review mechanism. The secretariat further “各事業所で活動している政策に影響を及ぼす直接的および間接的な活動を集約し、グループESH委員長(CSO)に報告する”, ensuring both direct and indirect lobbying activities are gathered, while the CSO then “グループESH委員長(CSO)は当社の気候変動戦略と一致することを確認する”, providing named executive oversight. Moreover, the company confirms “Yes” to having a public commitment to align its engagement activities with the goals of the Paris Agreement. We found no evidence of a publicly available climate-lobbying audit or more detailed reporting frequency, which suggests that while the governance structure and named oversight are robust, the depth of transparency around evaluation outcomes could be enhanced. 3