Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
While HPH Trust reports that it "continued to actively lobby both Hong Kong and Central government and policymakers, advocating for sector-specific support and increased collaboration in the GBA," the company does not disclose any internal governance mechanisms for its lobbying activities, such as oversight by a board or named individual, monitoring or review processes, or policies to align advocacy with climate-related or corporate goals.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust provides some insight into its climate-related public-policy activity, but the disclosure remains fairly high-level. It confirms that it "actively engages both Hong Kong government and policymakers as well as the Central government," and it describes mechanisms such as direct governmental engagement and participation in conferences and exhibitions like the Asia Fruit Logistica 2023 and the Yantian Cross-border E-commerce High-quality Development Forum, demonstrating a basic level of transparency on how and where it lobbies. The company also indicates the broad policy areas it addresses, citing work on “drawing action plans for maritime and port development,” “advocating for increased collaboration within the Greater Bay Area,” and exploring asset integration between Hong Kong and Yantian, but it does not name any specific climate laws, regulations, or bills. Likewise, its objectives are framed in general terms—seeking collaboration and sector-specific support—without detailing the concrete regulatory changes or quantitative targets it wishes to achieve. Overall, the disclosure outlines who is lobbied and the general themes of engagement, yet it stops short of identifying precise policies or clearly articulated policy outcomes.
|
D
|