Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Strong | ABN AMRO gives a detailed picture of which climate-related policy debates it joins. It names a range of identifiable measures, including the “EU taxonomy” and “ESRS/CSRD” corporate-reporting rules, its participation in the “Dutch climate adaptation plan working groups, organised by the Dutch government,” support for the Netherlands’ 2030 zero-emission vehicle mandate and the EU’s 2035 ban on new internal-combustion cars, as well as lobbying at EU level for “bringing financial institutions into scope of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D).” The bank also explains how it seeks to influence these files: it engages directly by “sharing information formally and informally in writing, one-on-one talks, exchanges with several stakeholders at a time, closed and public consultations and discussions with experts” with “members of the Dutch Parliament, Dutch government ministers and their ministries, the European Parliament, the European Commission and others,” and indirectly through trade bodies such as the Dutch Banking Association (NVB) and the Institute of International Finance (IIF). While it states general positions—such as “support with minor exceptions” for EU reporting standards and alignment of all activity with the Paris Agreement—it rarely sets out precise legislative amendments or numerical targets it is advocating, providing only limited clarity on the specific outcomes it is seeking. Overall, the company is highly transparent about the policies it engages on and the channels and targets of that engagement, but gives less detail on the concrete policy changes it wants to secure. | 3 |