Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
Pan African Resources PLC describes that "the board places specific focus on ESG considerations, risks, opportunities, stakeholder relations, innovation and the creation of shared value within the business," and notes that "we have enhanced our governance of climate change matters by including climate change in the mandates of our social and ethics committee, our safety, health, environment and quality (SHEQ) committee and our audit and risk committee." These structures produce substantive reporting on energy efficiency, water and waste management, and tailings oversight, but we found no evidence of any internal mechanisms, oversight structures or accountability measures specifically governing its lobbying activities, whether direct lobbying to policymakers or indirect engagement via trade associations. The company does not disclose any policy for reviewing or managing lobbying alignment with its climate objectives, nor any individual or formal body with responsibility for lobbying governance.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Pan African Resources provides only limited insight into its climate-policy lobbying. It references several identifiable policy frameworks and legislation, including the Presidential Climate Commission, the Climate Change Bill, the Low Emissions Development Strategy, the National Climate Change Adaptation Strategy and the Just Energy Transition Framework, signalling broad alignment with these initiatives, but it does not explain whether or how the company actually engaged policymakers on them. The report offers no concrete description of lobbying mechanisms—such as meetings, letters, or consultations—nor does it identify the governmental bodies or officials it may have approached. Likewise, the company voices general support for measures like a carbon tax and sets internal aspirations for renewable energy deployment, yet it does not specify the regulatory changes it seeks to secure through advocacy. As a result, while the company names relevant policy areas, the lack of detail on engagement methods and desired policy outcomes means its overall transparency on climate lobbying remains limited.
|
D
|