Asics Corp

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Moderate ASICS provides a moderate level of transparency on its climate-policy lobbying. It identifies two concrete Japanese policy frameworks it seeks to influence – the national greenhouse-gas reduction target of a 46 % cut by 2030 (from 2013 levels) and the renewable-electricity share target of 36–38 % by 2030 – and situates both within its wider support for the Paris Agreement. The company also discloses two distinct ways it tries to exert influence: it “joined the advocacy with the Japan Climate Initiative” to lobby the Japanese Government and it signed a public letter with more than 600 businesses to G20 leaders, the latter stating that “ASICS and over 600 businesses called on G20 leaders to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 °C.” These descriptions make clear both the mechanisms (coalition advocacy and an open letter) and the policymaking targets (the Japanese Government and G20 leaders). Finally, ASICS sets out the specific outcomes it is pursuing, most notably an increase in Japan’s renewable-power target to 40–50 % by 2030, alongside accelerated deployment of renewables and a national clean-energy strategy, explaining that the current levels are insufficient to meet Paris-aligned goals. While the company does not catalogue a wider set of legislative proposals or provide detail on every interaction, the combination of named policies, stated methods and clearly articulated desired changes demonstrates a reasonable degree of openness about its climate-lobbying activities. 2
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Moderate Asics Corp has implemented mechanisms to align its policy influencing with its climate change strategy through regular engagement with senior leadership. The company explains that "our policy influencing activities are consistent with our climate change strategy by involving and/or updating senior management regularly," and that "the most senior ASICS representative informs the ASICS President of any relevant organizational viewpoint developments which might impact on ASICS climate change strategy," while "regular status updates to senior management" are used to manage potential inconsistencies in trade association work. It even affirms a public commitment to conduct its engagement activities "in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement." However, the disclosure focuses on indirect lobbying via trade bodies and does not describe any oversight or procedures for direct lobbying activities, lacks formal criteria for assessing or exiting associations whose positions conflict with its climate objectives, and includes no dedicated audit, review or formal policy specific to climate-related lobbying. Oversight appears to be through broader sustainability and risk committees rather than a distinct lobbying governance framework. 2