Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate | United Rentals provides a moderate level of transparency on its climate-related lobbying. It discloses that it "works with legislature to craft appropriate language regarding certain environmental regulations," "participates in discussions around grants for low- and zero-emission equipment," and offers "feedback on current low- and zero-emission equipment and adoption challenges," showing several concrete mechanisms and identifying state legislatures in Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon and Texas as its targets. The company also quantifies its spend, noting that "our lobbying expenditure, including state and federal lobbying, totaled $481,845," and that detailed reports are filed publicly, further illustrating its engagement channels and breadth. On the substance of policies lobbied, it indicates that it focuses on "tax incentives to promote the adoption of alternative fueled equipment/vehicles" and broader work on “alternative fuels” and “low-carbon products and services,” but it stops short of naming specific bills or regulatory proposals, providing only high-level policy categories. Likewise, the outcomes it seeks remain general—the firm wishes to “progress the adoption of alternative fueled equipment” and ensure grant programmes “include all relevant technologies,” without specifying concrete legislative amendments, targets or timelines. Overall, while the company is open about how and where it lobbies, it offers limited detail on the exact policies it seeks to influence and the precise results it aims to secure. | 2 |