Disco Corp

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Disco Corp provides only limited transparency around its climate-related lobbying. It does identify two specific government initiatives it engages with – the Japanese “Act on the Rational Use of Energy (Energy Conservation Act)” and participation in a solar-power subsidy programme run by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization – demonstrating that the company is willing to name the legislation and public programmes it interacts with. The description of its engagement mechanism, however, is sparse: the company notes that it files greenhouse-gas reports and a mid-term emissions-reduction plan under the Energy Conservation Act, but it does not say which ministry receives these filings or describe any other direct or indirect approaches to policymakers. Finally, the company gives only broad statements about why it engages, indicating that compliance can “become a trigger to make a mid- to long-term plan and improve the amount of emissions” and that using subsidies “can achieve cost reduction and actively implement generating clean energies,” without specifying any concrete policy amendments, targets or regulatory changes it seeks. Because the disclosures stop short of detailing who is lobbied, how, and the specific outcomes Disco Corp wants, the overall level of transparency remains low. 1
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Disco Corp discloses a general oversight structure that could extend to its policy engagement, noting that progress on its climate goals is overseen by “最高環境責任者である執行役常務を委員長、また代表執行役社長および執行役副社長を委員とする全社環境委員会を定期的に開催し、経営会議・取締役会で付議・報告しております.” This indicates that a named committee chaired by the Chief Environmental Officer and including the CEO and EVP periodically reviews climate-related matters and reports to the board, suggesting at least some formal review step for ensuring “外部エンゲージメント活動が当社の気候コミットメントと整合しているか” as asked in the disclosure. However, the company provides no further detail on how it monitors or manages lobbying positions, offers no policy or process for aligning direct advocacy or trade-association membership with its climate targets, and does not describe any mechanism for challenging, correcting or exiting misaligned associations. Because the evidence is limited to high-level committee oversight without a specific lobbying-alignment framework, this indicates only limited governance around climate lobbying. 1