Morgan Sindall Group PLC – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
None	Morgan Sindall Group PLC integrates its climate change strategy into its “Responsible Business Strategy,” which, along with its “Five Total Commitments,” is “set at Group-level with sign off by the Group Management Team.” It operationalizes these commitments through structures such as “Responsible Business Forums at divisional level” and an “Environment forum and information share point in our Construction & Infrastructure division,” and monitors performance through “reporting performance against Total Commitments targets” with follow-up by the “Director of Sustainability & Procurement (DSP)” and divisional heads when “any inconsistencies are identified.” However, the company does not disclose any processes, oversight structures or responsible parties specifically governing its direct or indirect lobbying activities or how it aligns its policy engagement with its climate goals. Likewise, it confirms it “does not” currently have “a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” underscoring the absence of any specific lobbying governance framework in its disclosures. View Sources	E

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

None

Morgan Sindall Group PLC integrates its climate change strategy into its “Responsible Business Strategy,” which, along with its “Five Total Commitments,” is “set at Group-level with sign off by the Group Management Team.” It operationalizes these commitments through structures such as “Responsible Business Forums at divisional level” and an “Environment forum and information share point in our Construction & Infrastructure division,” and monitors performance through “reporting performance against Total Commitments targets” with follow-up by the “Director of Sustainability & Procurement (DSP)” and divisional heads when “any inconsistencies are identified.” However, the company does not disclose any processes, oversight structures or responsible parties specifically governing its direct or indirect lobbying activities or how it aligns its policy engagement with its climate goals. Likewise, it confirms it “does not” currently have “a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” underscoring the absence of any specific lobbying governance framework in its disclosures.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	Morgan Sindall Group provides some insight into its climate-policy lobbying by naming its involvement in the Greater London Authority’s “London Business Climate Leaders Group,” a CDP-led initiative that aims to make London the cleanest city by 2050. The company explains how it seeks to influence this local authority: its Director of Sustainability and Procurement “represents the Group alongside 10 other businesses,” and the firm is “liaising with major financial institutions on transport movements,” helping to create a network of EV charging points and promote electric-vehicle uptake. These descriptions reveal several concrete engagement mechanisms and identify the GLA as the policymaking target, demonstrating moderate clarity on how lobbying is carried out. However, the disclosure centres on a single policy platform and does not state whether this is the full extent of the Group’s climate-policy engagement. Moreover, while the narrative endorses broad ambitions—clean air, lower emissions, renewable energy, a circular economy, and waste reduction—it stops short of spelling out the specific legislative changes, targets, or amendments the company is pressing for. As a result, the transparency of the company’s lobbying objectives remains limited even though the underlying mechanisms are relatively well described.	D