Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
Intage Holdings Inc does not disclose a governance framework for aligning its lobbying or engagement activities with climate policy. It explicitly states "No, and we do not plan to have one in the next two years" regarding a public commitment to conduct engagement in line with the Paris Agreement, indicating no current or planned process to review or sign off on climate-related lobbying activities. We found no evidence of any oversight body, internal policy, or procedures for monitoring lobbying alignment, nor any mention of responsible parties or review mechanisms.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Intage Holdings provides a modest level of transparency around its climate-related lobbying. It identifies one specific policy focus—the Japanese “Green Purchasing Law”—and explains that it has been involved in “the examination of criteria for goods procured by the government” and in the ongoing “addition and revision of specific procurement items” since the law was enacted. By naming the national government of Japan as the audience for these efforts and describing how it participates in the policy process, the company offers clear insight into its lobbying mechanism and target. However, the disclosure stops short of detailing measurable or concrete policy changes it is trying to secure; it only states the broad aspiration to encourage “behavioral changes in consumers when selecting goods” and to reduce the overall “environmental impact” of products and services. Because only one policy is named and the desired outcomes remain high-level, the overall transparency of the company’s climate lobbying remains limited.
|
D
|