Direct Lobbying Transparency
| Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Limited | Qube Holdings offers only limited insight into its climate-policy advocacy. The company identifies one specific initiative—the Port Botany Regional Rail Incentive scheme—and notes that it is "actively engaged with the NSW Government and the NSW Freight Policy Review Program" to promote this modal shift from road to rail, but it does not cite any other pieces of legislation or regulatory proposals. Its description of how it seeks to influence policy is sparse: it points to indirect work through industry bodies such as the Australian Logistics Council and the Freight on Rail Group and mentions direct engagement with the NSW Government, yet it does not clarify the concrete mechanisms used (for example, formal submissions, meetings, or correspondence) nor does it list any additional policymaking targets. The desired outcome is articulated in broad terms—removing 50,000 truck movements per year from Sydney’s roads and avoiding up to 560,000 tCO2-e over 30 years—but beyond this single project it provides no further detail on the specific policy changes it wants to see or the positions it supports or opposes. Overall, the disclosure gives a general sense of direction but lacks the breadth and depth needed for strong transparency across policies, methods and objectives. | 1 |