Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Limited |
EZ Tec discloses that it manages its public-policy engagement mainly through participation in industry bodies, explaining that it is “associada e tem participação ativa em comitês e grupos da … ABRAINC … Secovi-SP e … Sinduscon-SP” and that through these fora it is “sempre acompanhando de perto … como as empresas do setor da construção estão evoluindo em relação aos temas sociais e ambientais.” This indicates the company has at least an informal process to monitor whether its collective advocacy is consistent with its climate objectives. It further states that it “trazemos a nossa experiência e necessidades de forma transparente para que possamos contribuir” and feels “responsabilidade de engajar outras empresas do setor num movimento de impacto positivo,” suggesting an intention to align sector lobbying with positive climate practices. However, the disclosure does not identify any internal policy, formal review mechanism, named individual, or board committee that oversees lobbying alignment, nor does it describe how the company evaluates positions taken by these trade associations or manages any misalignment. There is also no indication of direct-lobbying controls, escalation procedures, or publication of an alignment review. Overall the company shows a limited but explicit commitment to monitor its indirect engagement, while key elements of a structured lobbying-governance framework remain undisclosed.
View Sources
|
D |