China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Moderate CSCEC provides limited detail on the specific climate policies it has lobbied, identifying only its involvement in the “Hong Kong Construction Industry Council’s Green Finance Certification Scheme” alongside broad references to the “Sustainable Singapore Blueprint,” “Singapore Green Plan 2030,” and “Smart Nation 2025.” While it names the “Green Finance Certification Scheme,” it does not confirm whether these are the only policies it has engaged or provide legislative identifiers or timelines. The company notes that it “engaged with the Hong Kong Construction Industry Council” but stops short of specifying the mechanisms—such as meetings, letters, or formal consultations—and the exact policymakers targeted. In contrast, CSCEC clearly articulates three outcomes it seeks through its lobbying engagement, namely to “promote the construction industry’s adoption of green construction standards,” “improve green finance channels,” and “encourage more green and low-carbon projects.” This combination reflects moderate transparency: specific end goals are well-defined, but details on policy scope and engagement processes remain sparse. 2
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
None China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd highlights a strong internal structure for ESG—"we have established an ESG governance system guided by sustainable development principles," "ESG committees and ESG working group have been set up to lead ESG initiatives," and "we have enhanced ESG responsibilities in executive board meetings"—but we found no evidence of any governance process addressing direct or indirect lobbying activities, no policy or process described to ensure alignment of lobbying with its climate-related or policy goals, and no indication of an individual or committee tasked with overseeing lobbying activities. 0