Moncler SpA – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Moderate	Moncler SpA has established a moderate governance framework for aligning its climate lobbying, focusing specifically on its engagement with trade associations rather than direct lobbying efforts. The company places oversight with its Chief Corporate Strategy and Communications Officer, noting that "the person that is in charge for corporate relations (Chief Corporate Strategy and communication Officer) has also the responsibility of a department within which lies the Sustainability Unit, led by the CSO, and takes part to trade associations meetings. This ensures a complete alignment with Moncler Group’s climate strategy in engagement activities." This unit "asks for regular progress reports on projects, and updates the Control, Risks and Sustainability Committee accordingly", demonstrating ongoing monitoring by a formal committee. Moncler also makes clear that "In 2023 the Moncler Group did not make contributions to political parties, lobbying activities or any other activities beyond those with associative purposes," reinforcing an explicit limit on direct political advocacy. However, we found no evidence of any formal process or criteria for overseeing direct lobbying activities or for board-level sign-off on climate lobbying positions, indicating that the governance framework does not extend to all channels of policy influencing. View Sources	C

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

Moderate

Moncler SpA has established a moderate governance framework for aligning its climate lobbying, focusing specifically on its engagement with trade associations rather than direct lobbying efforts. The company places oversight with its Chief Corporate Strategy and Communications Officer, noting that "the person that is in charge for corporate relations (Chief Corporate Strategy and communication Officer) has also the responsibility of a department within which lies the Sustainability Unit, led by the CSO, and takes part to trade associations meetings. This ensures a complete alignment with Moncler Group’s climate strategy in engagement activities." This unit "asks for regular progress reports on projects, and updates the Control, Risks and Sustainability Committee accordingly", demonstrating ongoing monitoring by a formal committee. Moncler also makes clear that "In 2023 the Moncler Group did not make contributions to political parties, lobbying activities or any other activities beyond those with associative purposes," reinforcing an explicit limit on direct political advocacy. However, we found no evidence of any formal process or criteria for overseeing direct lobbying activities or for board-level sign-off on climate lobbying positions, indicating that the governance framework does not extend to all channels of policy influencing.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	Moncler Group provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The company indicates that it engages on climate issues indirectly through trade associations—most notably “The Fashion Pact,” as well as Camera Nazionale della Moda Italiana and Fondazione Altagamma—and explains that it sits on the Pact’s Steering and Operations Committees, but it does not name any specific government institutions, legislators, or regulatory consultations it targets through these forums. Likewise, while it refers to “maintaining open dialogue” and “sharing ideas and progress” within these associations, it offers no detail on concrete lobbying tools such as letters, submissions, or meetings with policymakers. The disclosures also stop short of identifying particular climate policies, laws, or regulatory proposals it seeks to influence, speaking only in broad terms about goals such as mitigating global warming, restoring biodiversity, or achieving “net-zero carbon impact by 2050” and using “100% renewable energy across operations by 2030.” As a result, the company signals a general commitment to climate action but does not transparently describe which policies it engages on, how it seeks to influence them, or the precise outcomes it advocates.	D