Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Limited |
Intertek discloses only rudimentary oversight of its lobbying activities rather than a structured climate-lobbying governance framework. The company notes that "Any interactions with governments, governmental authorities or regulators are reviewed by our Group Legal & Risk functions to ensure that we comply fully with all laws and regulations," indicating a review step and identifying the Group Legal & Risk functions as the internal body that signs off such engagements, and its Annual Report references a "Lobbying & Political Donations Policy" which implies a formal policy exists. However, the disclosure focuses on basic legal-compliance rather than on managing or assessing the alignment of lobbying positions with the company’s climate strategy, and Intertek concedes that it has “No, and we do not plan to have one in the next two years" when asked whether it has a public commitment to conduct engagement in line with the Paris Agreement. We found no evidence of a dedicated process for monitoring the climate-policy positions of trade associations, no description of how direct or indirect lobbying is assessed against climate goals, and no indication of board-level oversight or periodic climate-lobbying reviews. Consequently, the governance information provided is limited and does not extend beyond basic policy and compliance controls.
View Sources
|
D |