Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Vodafone provides an unusually detailed picture of its climate-related advocacy. It identifies multiple concrete policy files it has engaged on – including the consultation of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group on the role of spectrum in cutting CO₂, the EU Energy Efficiency Directive, the EU Ecodesign & Energy Labelling regulation, BEREC’s work on environmental indicators, and elements of the European Green Deal such as Extended Producer Responsibility and the Circular Economy Action Plan – giving enough information to locate each initiative in time and jurisdiction. The company also spells out how it attempts to influence those files: it “responded to consultations on EU Ecodesign & Energy Labelling policy,” filed submissions to BEREC and the Radio Spectrum Policy Group, took part in European Commission-DG ENER workshops and technical roundtables, and held “bi-lateral discussions with relevant members of the European Commission,” thereby naming both the methods and the specific targets of its lobbying. Finally, Vodafone is explicit about the outcomes it is pursuing. It calls for spectrum rules that encourage investment in newer, more energy-efficient radio technologies and allow the phase-out of legacy networks; proposes that the Energy Efficiency Directive focus on the most energy-intensive data centres and establish a harmonised EU framework; and urges Ecodesign rules that require longer device lifetimes, higher repairability and greater use of recycled materials. This level of specificity across the policies addressed, the channels used and the changes sought demonstrates comprehensive transparency in the company’s climate-policy lobbying. | 4 |