Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
None
|
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E
|
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
Limited
|
Qisda Corp offers only limited insight into its climate-policy lobbying. It explicitly identifies one regulatory instrument it has engaged with—the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism—describing the measure and its implementation timeline, but it does not mention any other climate policies or confirm that CBAM is the sole focus of its lobbying. On mechanisms, the disclosure indicates that the company “collected information regarding the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) from European Commission’s official website” and “responded to European Commission when Qisda had questions about CBAM,” signalling some direct contact but without naming the specific Commission directorates, officials, or consultation processes involved. The company does not state what change, amendment, or outcome it sought from this engagement, merely noting a neutral stance and alignment with the Paris Agreement. As a result, while the policy being followed is clear, Qisda provides minimal detail about how it lobbies or what it hopes to achieve, leading to a low overall level of transparency.
|
D
|