Equatorial Energia SA

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Moderate Equatorial Energia offers a moderate level of transparency about its climate-related lobbying. It explicitly identifies one state-level climate instrument it engaged on – Lei Estadual 11578/2021, which sets a policy for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation – but does not indicate whether it engaged with any additional policies. The company is much clearer about how it lobbies: it describes taking part in discussions within the Conselho Estadual de Meio Ambiente (CONSEMA), joining consultative meetings to secure technical regulation of the new law, and participating in the CONSEMA Technical Committee on Waste Management, naming the state environmental council and its sub-committee as its direct targets. However, it provides only a broad statement of intent, indicating it wants local rules to be “aligned with mechanisms such as the Clean Development Mechanism” and to obtain “technical regulation of the legislation,” without spelling out specific amendments, targets or other measurable outcomes it seeks. Overall, the disclosure outlines the channels and forums used but gives limited detail on the precise policy objectives it is pursuing. 2
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
None Equatorial Energia SA states that its external engagement is “balizadas na Política de Meio Ambiente,” which it believes aligns its activities with climate-change considerations, and highlights its participation in the “Conselho Estadual de Meio Ambiente do Maranhão … incluindo debates relativas as mudanças climáticas (Lei 11579/21)” as well as in the “Pacto Global (ODS13)” for “Discussões sobre propostas de mudanças dos cálculos do GHG Protocol” to adapt GHG tools to national criteria; however, the company does not disclose any specific internal process for reviewing or monitoring its lobbying or policy‐influencing activities, nor does it identify any individual or formal body responsible for oversight of its external engagement to ensure consistency with its climate commitments. 0