Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield provides a thorough and well-structured picture of its climate-policy advocacy. It names multiple, clearly identifiable policies on which it has intervened, including France’s building-energy law “Loi Elan,” the European “Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD)” and its upgrade to the “Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD),” the experimental “E+C-” low-carbon building label, and the French energy regulation “RE2020,” as well as its work on adapting the BBCA low-carbon construction scheme. The company also spells out how it lobbies and whom it targets: it works through industry bodies such as FSIF and CNCC, participates in “working groups of AFEP” during EU consultations, submits data and case studies (e.g., the Sisters Towers project for the E+C- trial), and joins public consultations led by ADEME and other French and EU authorities, explicitly directing these efforts at the French government and the European Commission to influence implementing decrees and directive revisions. Finally, it is explicit about the concrete results it seeks—“make sure the transcription of ‘Loi Elan’ into application decrees can be understood and applied on the field,” “strengthen the bridge between the French greenhouse gas emissions report (BEGES) and the declaration of extra-financial performance (DPEF),” simplify and harmonise non-financial reporting requirements, inform RE2020 carbon thresholds, and refine the E+C- methodology for high-rise buildings—showing clearly articulated objectives rather than general aspirations. Taken together, these disclosures demonstrate a comprehensive level of transparency across the policies addressed, the mechanisms employed, and the outcomes pursued. | 4 |