Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Limited |
Fujimi Inc provides only limited insight into its climate-policy lobbying. It does identify two specific Japanese regulations it engages with, the Climate Change Response Act and the Act on the Rational Use of Energy, which establishes a clear picture of the policy areas under discussion. Beyond naming these statutes, however, the company gives no information on how it tries to influence them—there is no description of meetings, written submissions, participation through trade associations, or the governmental bodies it approaches. Likewise, Fujimi Inc offers no explanation of the positions it takes or the changes it hopes to secure; it merely notes compliance and general support without specifying any amendments, targets, or rationales. As a result, while the policies being addressed are transparent, the mechanisms of engagement and the outcomes sought remain undisclosed.
|
1
|
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Limited |
Fujimi Inc provides only minimal insight into how it governs its lobbying and external engagement. In its CDP response the company states that it "does your organization have a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement? […] No" and nevertheless says it has "established a process for regular communication and reporting with external organizations" to ensure engagement activities are consistent with its climate commitments. This reference suggests the existence of some form of review or monitoring process, indicating limited governance, but the disclosure offers no detail on what the process entails, which individuals or bodies oversee it, or how the company evaluates and acts on any misalignment in either its direct lobbying or its participation in trade associations. Therefore, while the statement implies a basic mechanism, the company does not disclose any concrete oversight structure, named responsible party, or evidence of actively managing alignment, leaving most elements of a robust lobbying-governance framework unaddressed.
|
1
|