Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Ørsted provides highly detailed and specific disclosure of its climate-policy lobbying. It names multiple individual measures it works on, including the EU “Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism”, a “CO2 tax on heating” in Denmark, discussions on a UK “carbon floor”, the “EU ETS”, and “electricity market rules … for the integration of renewable electricity” in Asia-Pacific, as well as broader frameworks for offshore wind and energy-efficiency policy, each linked to the relevant jurisdiction. The company also explains how it tries to influence these measures, citing “direct dialogue with the political level, government officials, and other relevant stakeholders”, “regular interactions with Commission officials”, “regular exchanges with Members of the European Parliament”, and “dialogue with national policy makers in EU on Carbon Border Adjustment Tax (CBAM), Denmark (CO2 tax on heating), and stakeholders in the UK on carbon floor”, thereby revealing both the mechanisms used and the specific targets it contacts across Denmark, the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, Taiwan, the US and EU institutions. Finally, Ørsted is explicit about what it wants to achieve: it “supports any pricing of CO2”, backs initiatives to “stabilize and strengthen the price signal from the EU ETS”, advocates a “stable and transparent regulatory framework for renewable energy in general and offshore wind in particular”, and endorses electricity-market designs that enable renewables. By clearly describing the policies, the channels and audiences for engagement, and the concrete outcomes it seeks, the company demonstrates a comprehensive level of transparency around its climate-related lobbying activities. | 4 |