SATS Ltd – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
None	SATS Ltd’s disclosures centre on sustainability and supply chain governance, referencing structures such as the “ESG Steering Committee comprising members from our senior leadership team” and the board-level “Safety, Sustainability, and Risk Committee (SSRC)”, but the company does not disclose any governance processes specific to lobbying activities. We found no evidence of policies or procedures for aligning direct or indirect lobbying with its climate objectives, nor any mention of a designated individual or body overseeing lobbying alignment. The disclosures demonstrate strong ESG oversight for sustainability initiatives but do not address how the company manages or governs its lobbying efforts. View Sources	0

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

None

SATS Ltd’s disclosures centre on sustainability and supply chain governance, referencing structures such as the “ESG Steering Committee comprising members from our senior leadership team” and the board-level “Safety, Sustainability, and Risk Committee (SSRC)”, but the company does not disclose any governance processes specific to lobbying activities. We found no evidence of policies or procedures for aligning direct or indirect lobbying with its climate objectives, nor any mention of a designated individual or body overseeing lobbying alignment. The disclosures demonstrate strong ESG oversight for sustainability initiatives but do not address how the company manages or governs its lobbying efforts.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	The company offers only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It acknowledges that it “engaged with the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) and the wider Changi Airport community to align with the Sustainable Air Hub Blueprint,” signalling some interaction with a public authority around aviation decarbonisation, but it does not identify any concrete legislation or regulatory proposal beyond this high-level blueprint. The disclosure names CAAS as a policymaking counterpart, yet it does not explain how the company sought to influence the authority—whether through meetings, submissions, letters, or other channels—leaving the actual lobbying mechanism unclear. Finally, the company states an overarching aim of achieving net-zero domestic aviation emissions by 2050, but it does not spell out the specific policy changes, targets, or amendments it is advocating, so the desired outcomes remain generic. Altogether, the information provides only a basic indication of engagement, without the detail needed to demonstrate robust transparency.	1