Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Limited |
Concentradora Fibra Danhos offers only limited insight into how it governs lobbying and policy engagement. The company states that “In 2023, Fibra Danhos did not make any direct or indirect monetary contributions to political campaigns or organizations, lobbying groups, trade associations or other tax-exempt groups for the purpose of influencing political campaigns or legislation,” and, when asked about ensuring alignment of external engagement with its climate commitments, explains that “We are part of the ESG Committee of AMEFIBRA, and having a place at the table on discussions related to its climate change strategy ensures that our engagement activities are consistent with ours.” This reference shows an intention to keep any involvement in an industry body in line with its own climate approach, indicating some awareness of alignment, but the company does not disclose a formal policy, defined procedures, or monitoring mechanisms for climate-related lobbying, nor does it name a board committee or individual charged with reviewing such activities. The broader ESG governance structure it describes—“the ESG committee… is responsible for promptly and institutionally managing climate-related risks and opportunities and notifying the Technical Committee of its actions”—relates to overall sustainability oversight rather than to lobbying governance specifically. Consequently, while there is a brief acknowledgment of the need for consistency between engagement and climate strategy, no detailed governance process, audit, or oversight framework for lobbying activities is disclosed.
View Sources
|
D |