Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Strong |
ASKUL discloses a structured process for keeping its policy engagement aligned with its climate strategy. It explains that "グループ全体の環境活動に携わる実務を統括する『サステナビリティ(環境)部』が気候変動戦略や計画の策定を行っている" and that each business unit must run an "EMSに基づきPDCAサイクルを回している" with results brought to the "EMS責任者会議" at which "CEO・取締役員が出席". It further states that climate-related engagement by the business units or logistics centres "は全社環境活動として報告・管理され、CEOが出席するEMS責任者会議で進捗をレビューしている", demonstrating a recurring internal review mechanism. For activities that are “直接的な関与” with environmental policy, responsibility is assigned to specific staff in the Sustainability (Environment) Division, who must report back so that the company can "アスクルの気候変動戦略と一致していることを確認している", indicating an explicit alignment check before or after engagement. Indirect lobbying is also governed: dialogue with policymakers is conducted "加盟団体(日本気候リーダーズパートナーシップ)を通じて" and these actions too are "CEOが出席するEMS責任者会議で報告される". ASKUL therefore identifies a formal body that includes the CEO, sets a regular monitoring cycle, and covers both its own advocacy (e.g., participation in transport-decarbonisation government working groups) and its trade-association activities. However, the company does not disclose any publicly available lobbying-alignment report, nor does it describe specific criteria for assessing or escalating misalignment with other associations, so the depth of disclosure, while strong, remains short of a full public audit.
View Sources
|
B |