Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Chevron Corp has demonstrated a comprehensive level of transparency in disclosing its climate lobbying activities. The company has explicitly named specific climate-related policies and legislation it has engaged with, such as the "2023-2028 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Program," California Senate Bill (SB) X1-2, and the "Federal Acquisition Regulation: Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate-Related Financial Risk." Chevron also disclosed its support for the creation of a Climate Committee at the American Petroleum Institute (API) and its advocacy for the reauthorization of Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy (ARPA-E) and the expansion of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). These examples reflect Chevron's transparency in naming the policies it has lobbied for. Chevron has also provided detailed information about its lobbying mechanisms and targets. The company disclosed its engagement in direct lobbying through employees and contract lobbyists, as well as indirect lobbying via trade associations. Specific examples include submitting comments to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), addressing named officials such as Administrator Michael S. Regan, and participating in trade associations like the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the Business Roundtable (BRT). Chevron also highlighted its use of advanced methane detection technologies and collaborations with third-party monitoring programs, showcasing both direct and indirect lobbying mechanisms. Furthermore, Chevron has been explicit about the outcomes it seeks through its lobbying efforts. The company advocates for economywide carbon pricing as the primary policy tool to address climate change, supports performance-based methane regulations, and emphasizes the importance of technological innovation, such as advanced methane detection technologies. Chevron has also articulated its opposition to policies like SB X1-2, arguing that it would reduce investment and hurt consumers, while advocating for alternative solutions that incentivize innovation and investment. These disclosures clearly outline Chevron's desired policy changes and legislative goals, demonstrating a high level of transparency in its climate lobbying activities. | 4 |