Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | OCI NV provides extensive and specific information on every dimension of its climate-policy lobbying. It lists multiple named measures it has engaged on, including the EU Emissions Trading System, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, the Dutch Climate Tax, the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, and "proposed new carbon dioxide emissions regulations and additional taxes" in the Netherlands, as well as broader frameworks such as the Paris Climate Agreement and national cap-and-trade proposals. The company is equally explicit about the way it seeks to influence these policies, describing a variety of direct and indirect channels—"responding to consultations," "submitting public comments and in meetings with regulators with our industry associations," "ongoing dialogue with [the] Dutch government," and having "signed a non-binding Expression of Principles with the Dutch Government and the provinces of Limburg and South Holland." It names the public-sector counterparts for these activities, ranging from Dutch ministries and provincial authorities to EU regulators and U.S. policymakers. Finally, OCI NV is clear about the concrete outcomes it pursues: it has "successfully advocated for the inclusion of mass balance for sustainable production sharing facilities with conventional production," seeks to "ensure that all industrial sectors have a fair share of allowances reflecting the industrial reality," and aims "to accelerate the reduction of industrial CO2 emissions from our Dutch operations and discuss tailored government support such as on regulatory hurdles and funding gaps." This level of detail—covering the specific policies, the mechanisms and targets of engagement, and the precise changes sought—demonstrates comprehensive transparency in the company’s climate-related lobbying disclosures. | 4 |