Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Strong | City Developments Ltd discloses a wide range of climate-related public-policy engagements and generally explains them in detail, demonstrating a high level of transparency overall. The company names multiple specific measures it has worked on, including the Singapore Exchange “comply or explain” Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, the “Monetary Authority of Singapore’s green bond grant scheme,” the national “Carbon Pricing Bill,” and building-sector rules such as the “minimum environmental sustainability standard (Green Mark Standard) for existing buildings,” mandatory “periodic energy efficiency audits of building cooling systems,” and requirements to “submit information in respect of energy consumption” to the Commissioner of Building Control. CDL also sets out how it lobbies and who it targets: it has taken part in consultation sessions and briefings organised by SGX, held “meetings with government regulators on green financing,” provided building-energy data to the Building and Construction Authority, collaborated “closely with the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment,” and engaged regulators through its Chief Sustainability Officer’s roles with the UNEP Finance Initiative Property Working Group and MAS’s Financial Centre Advisory Panel. The desired outcomes of these efforts are described for several initiatives—for example, the company sought to help “promot[e] and formulat[e]” SGX’s sustainability-reporting framework and to “kick-start the green finance industry” by advocating government facilitation and support—though for some other policies, such as the carbon tax, it indicates only general support without spelling out specific amendments or targets. Together, these disclosures offer clear insight into the policies addressed and the methods of engagement, while the articulation of policy goals is detailed for key areas but less complete across the full portfolio of issues. | 3 |