Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Moderate |
Taikisha Ltd discloses a basic but structured mechanism for keeping its lobbying and other external engagement in line with its climate strategy, stating that "??????????????????????????????????????????" and that any policies promoted by "??????????" are "???????????????????????" so that the companys actions "???????????????????." This indicates that the companys Management Meeting serves as the formal body that reviews and, where necessary, modifies both direct engagement with government and indirect engagement through industry associations to maintain alignment with its climate-change strategy, showing a degree of oversight and an alignment process. However, the disclosure remains high-level: it does not set out the frequency of these reviews, the specific criteria used to assess alignment, or any examples of corrective action, and the company also acknowledges that it currently has No public commitment to conduct engagement in line with the Paris Agreement, only that it plan[s] to have one in the next two years. Because the governance description covers oversight and a general review mechanism but lacks detailed monitoring procedures, public reporting, or evidence of systematic alignment audits, this represents a moderate level of lobbying governance transparency rather than a fully developed system.
View Sources
|
C |