Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
Genuit Group PLC notes that "We are also increasingly involved in lobbying for standards regimes to be less prescriptive on how products are made, without compromising on performance" and that it "participate[s] in industry bodies within the UK and Europe, such as Construction Products Association (CPA), The European Plastic Pipes and Fittings Association (TEPPFA) and the British Plastics Federation (BPF)," using these inputs "to inform our assessment of identified transition risks relating to carbon tax, climate reporting obligations and the physical risk of material supply," but the company does not disclose any policy or process to ensure the alignment of its lobbying activities with its climate targets, and we found no evidence of any internal oversight structure, sign-off procedure, or named individual or committee responsible for governing those lobbying efforts.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Genuit Group provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It indicates participation in sector associations – “we participate in industry bodies within the UK and Europe, such as Construction Products Association (CPA), The European Plastic Pipes and Fittings Association (TEPPFA) and the British Plastics Federation (BPF)” – which confirms an indirect mechanism of engagement but does not spell out whether this involves meetings, written submissions, or other specific interactions, nor does it name the government bodies or officials approached. On the substance of policy, the company mentions that “we are also increasingly involved in lobbying for standards regimes to be less prescriptive on how products are made, without compromising on performance,” giving only a broad description of the area it seeks to influence and no identifiable legislation or regulation. Likewise, its explanation of desired outcomes remains generic, stating that “we aim to use our leadership position as a way of driving change” without clarifying the concrete amendments or targets it wants regulators to adopt. Overall, the disclosure signals some lobbying activity but lacks the detail needed to understand which climate-related policies are involved, how the company engages, and the precise changes it advocates.
|
D
|