Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Strong |
Pertamina Geothermal Energy PT discloses three specific regulatory instruments it has engaged on — Indonesia’s Nationally Determined Contribution, Presidential Decree No 98 of 2019 on the Framework on Carbon Pricing, and Ministry of Energy and Mineral Regulation No 16 of 2022 on carbon economic value in the power generation sector — demonstrating strong transparency on the policies it has lobbied. It is equally clear on the outcomes it seeks through its engagement, including accelerating relevant regulations, fostering the green hydrogen ecosystem, and providing clarity on the domestic carbon market mechanism. However, the company provides only a general description of its lobbying approach, referring broadly to “engaging with related government agencies” without naming which agencies were targeted or detailing how those engagements took place, indicating limited clarity on the how and whom of its lobbying activities.
|
3
|
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Limited |
Pertamina Geothermal Energy PT provides only limited insight into how it governs lobbying and policy engagement. It states that "Pertamina memiliki kebijakan tidak memberikan kontribusi dana politik, sumbangan apapun termasuk penggunaan fasilitas Perseroan, untuk kegiatan politik maupun individu politisi," and confirms "Does your organization have a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement?[…]Yes," which signals a high-level intention to align any advocacy with the Paris goals. The company also acknowledges participating in legislative discussions "PERTAMINA bersama Asosiasi Perusahaan Migas (Aspermigas) menghadiri RDP" on amendments to the Oil and Gas Law, indicating it does engage indirectly through an industry association. However, the evidence does not disclose a formal procedure for monitoring or reviewing climate-lobbying alignment, name any individual or committee responsible for such oversight, or explain how discrepancies with trade-association positions are addressed. Consequently, while there is a stated commitment, the underlying governance mechanisms, accountability structures, and monitoring processes for lobbying activities are not described.
|
1
|