Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
None
|
O-I Glass Inc indicates that it "embraces the opportunity to collaborate with other companies and engage directly with policymakers and trade associations to positively influence sustainability public policy" and notes that it "remains committed to providing leadership and advocacy to certain industry associations," highlighting its widespread participation in glass industry associations "in virtually every country in which we do business" and its leadership roles in education and advocacy groups. However, the company does not disclose any processes, oversight structures, monitoring procedures, or named individuals tasked with ensuring that these engagement activities are aligned with its overall climate change strategy, nor does it describe how it reviews or governs direct or indirect lobbying efforts. We found no evidence of a governance framework to manage or align its public policy engagement with its climate objectives.
View Sources
|
E
|
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
Limited
|
O-I Glass offers only a limited window into its climate-policy lobbying. It indicates that it works through industry bodies such as the Glass Packaging Institute and the European Container Glass Federation and supports sector campaigns like the EU “Close the Glass Loop” initiative, showing that indirect engagement via trade associations is one channel it uses, but it does not name specific governmental departments, legislators or consultation processes it targets. The company likewise refers in broad terms to “recycling and environmental regulations” and circular-economy measures, without identifying any particular bill, regulation or jurisdiction it has sought to influence. Finally, it frames its desired outcomes as general aspirations—such as expanding glass-recycling availability to all locations and increasing recycled content to 50 % by 2030—rather than spelling out the concrete legislative or regulatory changes it wants policymakers to adopt. Taken together, the disclosures demonstrate awareness of climate-related policy engagement but stop short of the detail needed for strong transparency.
|
D
|